Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47615 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14740 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 18:30:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 18:30:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike503@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike503@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.222.191 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike503@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.191 mail-pz0-f191.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.191] ([209.85.222.191:37778] helo=mail-pz0-f191.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A2/B0-11385-7CBABAB4 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:30:32 -0500 Received: by pzk29 with SMTP id 29so1198368pzk.27 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P1xDArwUoiWX/QJS1Z8PmiaPav6cHF7RoUnzTP5ZiiI=; b=VGDJNn2O7k/mMCi/vhVuUZQkskHpfMDgxWYo6w0VOHrTDQb9trnkvXnbXDY99JEM8A H6Ijhzgvv3ofQnrOF6CpK0jGXrGmL2rOfomWK7EiGPFaQVhoBxtw2OTKnCtZqt5TFSUN LZHxKIYwTGv80fSJZpyW1mgR3uIYKZJIkHtTQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EnvZDKLv6lti8lQLUBii3Mnd3aMPBhP7UO8tRTVGPF7W2PkohWMVKH2Vi94A40vCKV zn7VMQSvervqzueXl9OlU+l/6GtLzsktpYZGlJq2sd6qnBJwbcdcled/pLcKOGHaiOdT YtRYa2t/mwBGaQ6MjnIIYdLbPgoCN5NypwIds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.82.42 with SMTP id f42mr5189832rvb.32.1269541824520; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3bea96c41003250709jd391239te35ab88b46e4803e@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org> <4BA92B72.1050207@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323230046.12e71d80@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com> <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100324102437.0b491a68@zend.com> <4BA9D167.30006@daylessday.org> <99cf22521003240334y6fb76fbcs4347429f3be48d49@mail.gmail.com> <3bea96c41003250709jd391239te35ab88b46e4803e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:24 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgTG95ZXQ=?= Cc: dreamcat four , Antony Dovgal , Zeev Suraski , Derick Rethans , php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC From: mike503@gmail.com (Michael Shadle) 2010/3/25 J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Loyet : > ** Default Section ** > Talking about redundancy. When there is more than one pool, there is > several parameters which remain the same. Why should we type them > several time ? The idea is to define a special pool, which will not be > started but only be used as a "template" with default values for other > pools. Common parameters will be set in the default pool and in each > pool only specifics parameters will be set. here some example in the > two previous cases Redundancy can be addressed by includes. I was thinking of creating an RFC for php.ini file support of includes, but FPM should support includes either - whether it is it's own INI file, the same XML file it's always been, whatever. It should be added to the FPM RFC.