Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47584 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20641 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 23:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 23:35:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.117 us-mr1.zend.com Received: from [63.205.162.117] ([63.205.162.117:38517] helo=us-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 99/AD-15489-FA1AAAB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:35:12 -0500 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (us-ex1.zend.net [192.168.16.5]) by us-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9687143FAC; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.16.93] ([192.168.16.93]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:35:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4BAAA1AC.5080102@zend.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:35:08 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <3EC72D91-EA33-4175-B9F5-E1A61757916B@pooteeweet.org> <7f3ed2c31003241310nad662e1uad7d5bbe8f985e5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c31003241310nad662e1uad7d5bbe8f985e5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2010 23:35:08.0563 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3C00630:01CACBAA] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Output buffering patch From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > I really do not see why this even needs a discussion. Its been in > trunk for years already. People have had plenty of time to give > feedback. > > Is there really anyone who doesn't want this committed? For what reason? I don't think there's a reason not to commit it - but it also would be very nice if we had some good explanation of what happens there, which is in a place where it's easy to find. Not because the patch is bad or something but because it'd be easy to work with it in the future this way. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com