Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47582 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50954 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 20:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 20:29:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.42 mail-ww0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.42] ([74.125.82.42:40173] helo=mail-ww0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 11/9F-15489-C167AAB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:29:18 -0500 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so1196862wwc.29 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=30W/NMHVuoVUYa7WsNZo4RWAYC28++hPn/hovtH6XyA=; b=ClG7ORM87COYATWeHwu6UelpLPXvf18ATi+Ryo49WBpaIctgqkI6qmncC7ee/Erulj Selb5gnjpV5Cax13hHX5vBO/GWPltPDa5Q3Qx5uyFJf9LGAcQv3uAz2+H2UEW7jHOnsO wZDJe1mpesRUNvD/OcmAQ0fwn8l82YUJNa5/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=M1oSWDG7WtiDvGp60tTykV6MgJAOc+pbqAGEJ2lh1bE1xKp41jrVztGZJLQW1OmaSx ySl20H63iFCKW2pLJStMDkbZr0krmr+/dOceQ4r9+lodASv7MnP9HnxEAMfkfa98OTr2 89C91y0UM4UnlaqjZlmTKDoi94AyZ2ZbRKxVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.134 with SMTP id u6mr2516288wee.213.1269462552747; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c31003241310nad662e1uad7d5bbe8f985e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <3EC72D91-EA33-4175-B9F5-E1A61757916B@pooteeweet.org> <7f3ed2c31003241310nad662e1uad7d5bbe8f985e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:29:12 +0100 Message-ID: To: Hannes Magnusson Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Developers Mailing List , Michael Wallner , Jani Taskinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Output buffering patch From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Hannes, On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:54, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> Hey, >> >> Could one of you write up a short RFC on this patch? Just some details about the bugs fixed, known BC breaks and (undocumented) edge case changes. This would be helpful for anyone wanting to review their code and testing as well as documentation. >> > > I really do not see why this even needs a discussion. Its been in > trunk for years already. People have had plenty of time to give > feedback. > > Is there really anyone who doesn't want this committed? For what reason? In this case the RFC will help to: - get a clear understanding about the changes - explain how it affects the respective internals area - helps to document the changes effectively But it is really not about finding a reason not to commit this change or discuss again whether or not we want it. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org