Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47576 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59764 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 18:19:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 18:19:04 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.68 unknown Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:19:03 -0500 Received: from [217.114.211.68] ([217.114.211.68:3778] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 74/8A-33174-7975AAB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:19:03 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE03F16456@us-ex1.zend.net> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (SunOS) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Posted-By: 217.114.211.68 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] trunk is alive and open From: dsp@php.net (David Soria Parra) On 2010-03-24, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > >> On 23.03.2010, at 23:04, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> >> > What about defining a release manager for the next release? I think that >> > is an important aspect of moving things forward. I also thought the dual >> > RM in PHP 5.3 worked quite well although it is not necessarily a must. >> >> Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite >> committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. > > I'd be happy to do so. >> In case he feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM, > > I'd like to do this with David. Although I can see me doing RM as well (as proposed), I don't think having two tech people as RMs would be good and might result in unecessary discussions during a release phase (for sure there is a benifit splitting work while on rm is not available). I think it is good to have a co-RM that focus on community work. David