Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47572 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45640 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 17:19:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 17:19:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain sci.fi from 204.13.248.71 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jani.taskinen@sci.fi X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.13.248.71 mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org Received: from [204.13.248.71] ([204.13.248.71:52860] helo=mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/D7-33174-E994AAB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:19:26 -0500 Received: from cs27025051.pp.htv.fi ([89.27.25.51] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1NuUEl-000C96-6p; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:19:23 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 89.27.25.51 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+3GHYFJesDbuNG976ksgO6puDFVvPcr5c= Message-ID: <4BAA49A1.5010609@sci.fi> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:19:29 +0200 Reply-To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: Andi Gutmans , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE03F16456@us-ex1.zend.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] trunk is alive and open From: jani.taskinen@sci.fi (Jani Taskinen) 24.3.2010 12:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > On 23.03.2010, at 23:04, Andi Gutmans wrote: > >> What about defining a release manager for the next release? I think that >> is an important aspect of moving things forward. I also thought the dual >> RM in PHP 5.3 worked quite well although it is not necessarily a must. > > > Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM, after all its important that the two RM's know and trust each other well so that they can speak with a consistent voice. > Yeah, lets. I'm fine with Derick. IIRC Rasmus also volunteered. Either one of them or both as long as Lukas and Pierre keep their hands off. --Jani