Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47555 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48624 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 10:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 10:37:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:51378] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/31-04090-68BE9AB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:37:59 -0500 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B593350508; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:18:14 +0200 (IST) Received: from LAP-ZEEV.zend.com ([10.1.2.209]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:37:50 +0200 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20100324123621.0b7ed170@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:37:49 +0200 To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" , Cc: "Andi Gutmans" , "PHP Developers Mailing List" , "Pierre Joye" In-Reply-To: References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE03F16456@us-ex1.zend.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2010 10:37:50.0097 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D0EE010:01CACB3E] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] trunk is alive and open From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 12:08 24/03/2010, Pierre Joye wrote: > > Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems > quite committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next > release. In case he feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM, > after all its important that the two RM's know and trust each other > well so that they can speak with a consistent voice. > >As I think it is still a bit early to design RMs, I am still in favour >of David and you. Or David and someone else with good communication >skills. You suggested Chris and I think he could do a great job. My >only worry is his time availability. But I'm definitively not in >favour of Derick, he has been a RM already, let give newer people a >chance. FWIW I too want to see you co-RMing. I think you being there, alongside someone else can bring great balance to the release. Zeev