Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47548
Return-Path: <zeev@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 38100 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 08:29:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 08:29:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com  
Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:43735] helo=il-mr1.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 25/F1-28024-67DC9AB4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:29:51 -0500
Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21])
	by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4CA504CB;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:55 +0200 (IST)
Received: from LAP-ZEEV.zend.com ([10.1.2.209]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:29:35 +0200
Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20100324102437.0b491a68@zend.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:29:34 +0200
To: "Antony Dovgal" <tony@daylessday.org>
Cc: "Derick Rethans" <derick@php.net>,"php-dev" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org>
References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org>
 <4BA8F72E.5090701@sci.fi>
 <4BA8F985.1090109@daylessday.org>
 <bd9320b31003231226v302da734g391a9eff9494bccf@mail.gmail.com>
 <4BA919D2.3060605@daylessday.org>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20100323222839.12d7b088@zend.com>
 <3bea96c41003231344l20e6c64ewad7715bebc2f773f@mail.gmail.com>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20100323225305.12e71c38@zend.com>
 <4BA92B72.1050207@daylessday.org>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20100323230046.12e71d80@zend.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003232155350.4153@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com>
 <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2010 08:29:35.0521 (UTC) FILETIME=[22BBC110:01CACB2C]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)

At 10:21 24/03/2010, Antony Dovgal wrote:

>On 24.03.2010 01:16, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > For me it is a requirement before the code makes it into a released
> > version of PHP, and I think many others think that way if past
> > discussions are any indication.  That's what RFCs are for - if people
> > can just go ahead and implement their original thoughts without
> > paying attention to feedback, why bother?
> > Personally I think that the person pushing the code should be
> > responsible for implementing the feedback to the RFC (or getting
> > others to do it).
>
>I think you're missing something.
>
>I don't care if FPM is in or out of the core.

FWIW, I don't think it's a good start for a component that goes into 
our distribution.
In this case I'm willing to take responsibility for doing the 
conversion, but for the record, if someone proposes to put a 
component into the PHP distro and refuses to implement the feedback 
(not every last piece of anecdotal feedback, but the key points) 
because it's not important enough in his view, I do think it should 
preclude the component from being accepted.  We have the RFC process 
for a reason.

Zeev