Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31354 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 08:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 08:21:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:49078] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E2/60-28024-D9BC9AB4 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:21:50 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.178] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19FF4BFA085; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:21:45 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:21:44 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 SUSE/3.0.1-1.2 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski CC: Derick Rethans , php-dev References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org> <4BA8F72E.5090701@sci.fi> <4BA8F985.1090109@daylessday.org> <4BA919D2.3060605@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323222839.12d7b088@zend.com> <3bea96c41003231344l20e6c64ewad7715bebc2f773f@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323225305.12e71c38@zend.com> <4BA92B72.1050207@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323230046.12e71d80@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 24.03.2010 01:16, Zeev Suraski wrote: > For me it is a requirement before the code makes it into a released > version of PHP, and I think many others think that way if past > discussions are any indication. That's what RFCs are for - if people > can just go ahead and implement their original thoughts without > paying attention to feedback, why bother? > Personally I think that the person pushing the code should be > responsible for implementing the feedback to the RFC (or getting > others to do it). I think you're missing something. I don't care if FPM is in or out of the core. The only thing I get in case if it's accepted is more troubles as I'll have to maintain it. Nevertheless, I feel that it's a good thing, therefore I'm pushing it in. But if somebody wants me to rewrite a substantial and well-tested part of the code in order to use another syntax style just because XML is "too complex for mere mortals" - I won't do it. If there are any volunteers to do this - go ahead, let's see what happens. If there are none - fine, I have enough stuff to maintain already. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal --- http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP