Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47523 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63580 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2010 22:04:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2010 22:04:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dreamcat4@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dreamcat4@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.209 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dreamcat4@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.209 mail-fx0-f209.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.209] ([209.85.220.209:43753] helo=mail-fx0-f209.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/12-51225-6FA39AB4 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:04:39 -0500 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so7768905fxm.13 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9qE5aDe9XOx/tfs2TukRBCqQI4aWqcDgJjPA0BfKnak=; b=XYvaVi06F8Ta5hIsfRp8mIhyuRJuz+OzClnfrL63CsDD7LtDczGXG3gswlmrCVmU4P +S0FB6w2F5CH6+KndGJRjjKuQQvYLHIYC8FDFza3iylyC971iMxnIZ6krbW2MVTkiCPk BlTPluOHCBxXT1bMJmEiAvJR6aJn0xklB39eI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ALB7U+MYEUKUTkc96Kop9c6lluCyZXkk1wvtspLykUEQlQa6HyI12bzlAhiJ7EDD2s 1ldu/FQgEd3C+9L8Lb4VUKns5AhPcG/y38eOU/TjZzjJYess62klkMay0mzIuOP3Ufh1 rtbwEOoSJD7WiZcuc62auy9WI51EIKK1CG7AY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.64.83 with SMTP id d19mr705290fai.15.1269381874257; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA92AD2.8010709@daylessday.org> References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org> <4BA8F72E.5090701@sci.fi> <4BA8F985.1090109@daylessday.org> <4BA919D2.3060605@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323222839.12d7b088@zend.com> <4BA92AD2.8010709@daylessday.org> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:14 +0000 Message-ID: <99cf22521003231504m7f0ce0d8sc22178c7eb6cd732@mail.gmail.com> To: Antony Dovgal Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC From: dreamcat4@gmail.com (dreamcat four) On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > Now I was never an XML fan myself, but I think THIS particular XML config file > is even easier to read and understand than php.ini. Actually, I agree with Antony on this point. The existing XML config file is pretty easy to read. I didn't implement it myself, but during a (brief period) as maintainer for the FPM code, I saw absolutely no need to change it. Even if you are unfamiliar with xml, the file is well commented. But heh, I happened to be one of those people who never really understood php ini files. So maybe im a bit biased. But I never *ever* had even a single person email me saying they couldnt understand the xml config file. If anything, it felt like quite the reverse situation. People kept emailing me, telling me all this stuff about what it did, that I was unaware of. Whats missing in my view is clear documentation to explain each of the configuration options. Which may be a good thing for either the FPM unix man page, or the parallel (seperate) php online documentation. > -- > Wbr, > Antony Dovgal > --- > http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >