Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:4747 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69826 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Oct 2003 09:22:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69792 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 09:22:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx.thebrainroom.net) (65.200.24.98) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 09:22:16 -0000 Received: by mx.thebrainroom.net (Postfix, from userid 517) id D2410148808C; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zaneeb.thebrainroom.net (zaneeb.thebrainroom.net [82.133.1.138]) by mx.thebrainroom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9351488087; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from titan (titan.thebrainroom.net [82.133.1.139]) by zaneeb.thebrainroom.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h989M4K01900; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:22:07 +0100 Message-ID: <038401c38d7d$a170d2a0$8b018552@titan> To: "netcat" , "PHP Development" References: <3F83BCE9.5040309@abox.co.il> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:21:59 +0100 Organization: The Brain Room Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS,REFERENCES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-TBR-Filter: Virus scanned and defanged Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] advice request on new php extension : phprep From: wez@thebrainroom.com ("Wez Furlong") > [Questions] > > Is sf.net the right place to publish? As Lukas pointed out, why use sf.net to host your PHP extension when you can use the PHP facilities? :-) Please read this link for more information about PECL: http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.pecl.dev&article=5 > Do I have restrictions (because it's a php extension) > on picking up a license for the soft? > (I mean except ones on sf.net) In terms of licensing, BSD and non-viral Open Source licenses are suitable for use with a PECL-hosted extension. We strongly recommend that all PECL extensions are licensed using our own PHP License. If you are wrapping a library (which you are), the library itself can be LGPL provided that you don't bundle a modified version of it with the extension. However, if the library is GPL, that would cause your extension to become a GPL extension, and we can't have GPL code in PECL. Unfortunately, librep itself falls under the GPL, which means that we can't host your extension in PECL (please check the archives for pecl-dev list for more information). If you can find a BSD licensed alternative for librep, then it would be welcome. You are also welcome to propose other extensions for PECL. So, it looks like sf.net is your best option right now. > I want to publish first and than introduce that to my boss. > Seems to be the correct order? Depends on your boss ;-) > What are my chances the people will join the project after > i will publish it ? If the extension seems to be quite useful to a number of people, then the chances are quite good. --Wez.