Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47280 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69731 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2010 22:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2010 22:27:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rich@richgray.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rich@richgray.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain richgray.com from 209.85.218.216 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rich@richgray.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.216 mail-bw0-f216.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.216] ([209.85.218.216:55042] helo=mail-bw0-f216.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9D/51-07348-3E26D9B4 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:27:48 -0500 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2609447bwz.23 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.36.70 with SMTP id s6mr1509160bkd.22.1268605664354; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Spa.local ([93.10.129.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s17sm18034944bkd.4.2010.03.14.15.27.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4B9D62DD.60207@richgray.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:27:41 +0100 Reply-To: rich@richgray.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <4B9BC369.6030404@keryx.se> In-Reply-To: <4B9BC369.6030404@keryx.se> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000101010503080508030306" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Next major version must be 7 (Lessons learned from the ECMAScript committee) From: rich@richgray.com (rich gray) --------------000101010503080508030306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Keryx Web wrote: > Summary: > > A. There seem to be universal agreement that the up until last week > branch of PHP called trunk was going to be PHP 6 is a dead end and not > the way into the future. (I'll call this "PHP 6.old" from now on. > is this the case? --------------000101010503080508030306--