Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47235 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90128 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 18:14:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 18:14:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.211.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.211.204 mail-yw0-f204.google.com Received: from [209.85.211.204] ([209.85.211.204:46283] helo=mail-yw0-f204.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D0/9C-15916-EE5DB9B4 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:14:08 -0500 Received: by ywh42 with SMTP id 42so852850ywh.7 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.164.32 with SMTP id r32mr2396944ano.178.1268504043320; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (adsl-69-230-99-94.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [69.230.99.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1645094gxk.7.2010.03.13.10.14.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:14:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B9BD5E7.6070909@lerdorf.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:13:59 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100309 Shredder/3.0.4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 03/13/2010 08:57 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >> So I think Lukas and others are right, let's move the PHP 6 trunk to a >> branch since we are still going to need a bunch of code from it and >> move development to trunk and start exploring lighter and more >> approachable ways to attack Unicode. We have a few already. >> Enhanced mbstring and ext/intl. Let's see some good ideas around that >> and work on those in trunk. Other features necessarily need to play >> along with these in the same branch. I refuse to go down the path of >> a 5.4 branch and a separate Unicode branch again. >> >> The main focus here needs to be to get everyone working in the same >> branch. > > I am also in favour for getting back to one branch for new development. > And that "branch" should be trunk. However, I am a little bit reluctant > to just "kill" all Unicode support. I don't think we can get around the > fact that propr Unicode support is going to be even more important in > the future than it already is today. However, we can also not get around > the fact that the current state of "Unicode-in-PHP" isn't the most ideal > situation. You know I am not in favour of "killing" Unicode. We can't kill Unicode. We live in a Unicode world, like it or not. We just need to reset the effort and do it in smaller steps. So, setting aside the current trunk in a branch and slowly bringing the good bits and pieces from it into the development branch in a way that doesn't alienate everyone should be the goal here. > - get rid of Jani's play branch I don't think Jani has messed up anything in that branch yet, so that could be the new trunk. It's just cloned from 5.3 exactly like you are proposing. > As I now have plenty of time to work on things, I'd be happy to act as > RM, and wouldn't mind working on roadmaps and sorting out what good bits > we have/had, and which things we don't want to port back into the new > trunk. Depending on how things go, this could become 5.4 or 6 or > something else. Cool, theoretically I have plenty of time right now as well, although in practice that doesn't seem to be the case. -Rasmus