Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47231 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78744 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 17:34:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 17:34:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.134 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.134 mailout2.netbeat.de Linux 2.6 Received: from [83.243.58.134] ([83.243.58.134:45603] helo=mailout2.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0C/4A-15916-1ACCB9B4 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:34:28 -0500 Received: (qmail 32073 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2010 17:28:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@90.136.217.151) by mailout2.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 13 Mar 2010 17:28:51 -0000 X-Originator: 9e51b244e0a38413ab6a9876e36ba9df To: Derick Rethans Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf , PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: php.net Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1268501626.14276.51.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) Hi, On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 11:57 -0500, Derick Rethans wrote: > So I would suggest the following things to do: > > - get rid of Jani's play branch > - move trunk to branches/FIRST_UNICODE_IDEA > - put 5.2 in security fix only mode > - pht 5.3 in bug fix only mode > - start adding new features (traits, Ilia's scalar typehint patch, > output buffering things) to the new trunk cloned from 5.3. > - in the meanwhile, start working on patching in back Unicode support, > but in small steps. Exactly which things, and how we'd have to find > out. But I do think it needs to be a *core* language feature, and not > simply solved by extensions. We also need to make sure everybody > understands that Unicode isn't just about encodings, or charsets and > that thre are differences between that. Education is going to be > important (and adding Unicode back in small bits would certainly help > there). +1 johannes