Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47157
Return-Path: <ronabop@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 55875 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 11:53:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 11:53:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ronabop@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ronabop@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ronabop@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.179 mail-iw0-f179.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.223.179] ([209.85.223.179:59179] helo=mail-iw0-f179.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 96/BD-13686-64B2A9B4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:53:42 -0500
Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so955812iwn.17
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:53:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=87ZVq2b+XW/VIIRMswdrnHY3WvmvJk9SFClVJ038bb0=;
        b=A5zsJXWfOKeREURmjBvsR63hzVnksJTekjDB3pNo/I+9trzFD0AMQE4PgN3INVBGeK
         FhKTFngqcND0emNLr1Cvw9t07TTqfh0LFGm+plxm1LHmXirznlbaVkfGGZ0OsAuVhZvc
         Y8qSb0pajCx72zFNtpSUTXxRP0TdE/myunFdg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aoWDTY5aOupEvwLNkJy1a8KeIBkvOERceOTsc6NIJjVb3DoGWKQXhkt4zPnMAcvnNC
         ZDWcXrY0bibAEWTsKS7+MM1RLqZCJxwhQuzJq8ot0q4/ylMIprPr8HOMvBO6IJYLlJ30
         /7nNqPMtIzCHPHN9e9LBUBcYfWqWL8Q5DF9ZE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.153.205 with SMTP id l13mr88747ibw.64.1268394820300; Fri, 
	12 Mar 2010 03:53:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fe05d1541003120204i53dfdd5ayf1e6dcc9ef338ef1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com>
	 <fe05d1541003120204i53dfdd5ayf1e6dcc9ef338ef1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:53:40 -0800
Message-ID: <6ca931441003120353m745d96b2v23cdbae91b3070e9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, 
	PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6
From: ronabop@gmail.com (Ronald Chmara)

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrot=
e:
>> Ah, Jani went a little crazy today in his typical style to force a
>> decision. =A0The real decision is not whether to have a version 5.4 or
>> not

Jani is passionate, and that's a good thing.

WRT a 5.4, we can stay on the 5.X tree forever.

Why not 5.194? Why not 5.196187?

If there's a 6.X tree, if there's a 6.X change, we need to have a "6"
reason that is clear.

See the 4-5 transitions (along with mail logs, etc.) for background.