Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47143 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56331 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 02:17:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rafaeldohms.com.br from 209.85.160.170 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:34121] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A3/AD-18254-524A99B4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:17:09 -0500 Received: by gyd10 with SMTP id 10so345300gyd.29 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:17:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.9.2 with SMTP id m2mr203089ani.8.1268360226351; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:17:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1268348090.3959.52.camel@guybrush> References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> <4B995F83.1000605@prohost.org> <4B99639B.9030405@oracle.com> <4B996975.9070003@oracle.com> <4B997230.3070801@prohost.org> <1268348090.3959.52.camel@guybrush> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:17:06 -0300 Message-ID: <33cd61491003111817q3ff31924l7249a24b7de4d2e9@mail.gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 From: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br (Rafael Dohms) 2010/3/11 Johannes Schl=FCter : > > On the other hand merging tests to5.2 and 5.3 means that we can find new > BC breaks we had overseen and either fix them or document them properly. > > So I won't "waste" too much time but not forget about 5.2. > > johannes > > As much as I agree with the push for 5.3 adoption, its surely not a reality with most of the community out there, like the hosting companies for example. So like last year i guess we should surely focus on 5.3, but not discourage any 5.2 work and keep writing the test for all across, 5.2, 5.3, 6.0 Everyone at our test fest did that, save in cases where the functionality was not available or altered, the tests we basically the same for all versions, and i even caught a few 5.2 issues in the process. I agree in keeping the tests alive for 5.2. --=20 Rafael Dohms PHP Evangelist and Community Leader http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br http://www.phpsp.org.br