Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47136 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22724 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 22:33:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 22:33:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.117 us-mr1.zend.com Received: from [63.205.162.117] ([63.205.162.117:46726] helo=us-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 44/18-18254-BCF699B4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:33:48 -0500 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (us-ex1.zend.net [192.168.16.5]) by us-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1846E43F81 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.16.106] ([192.168.16.106]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:33:43 -0800 Message-ID: <4B996FC6.7040102@zend.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:33:42 -0800 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> <4B995F83.1000605@prohost.org> <4B99639B.9030405@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4B99639B.9030405@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2010 22:33:43.0294 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7C9D9E0:01CAC16A] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > I'd also like to see us start a slow deprioritization of 5.2 work. > Instead effort should go into making 5.3 the prefered stable branch. > One specific example is that Test Fest 2010 tests shouldn't be merged > to 5.2. I agree with you on 5.3 in general but I think having more tests in 5.2 wouldn't hurt anybody. If there are people willing to do this work, why not? It's not the code, so it has no risk, just the reward... -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com