Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47131 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89671 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 21:24:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 21:24:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@ilia.ws; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@ilia.ws; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ilia.ws designates 209.85.218.216 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@ilia.ws X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.216 mail-bw0-f216.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.216] ([209.85.218.216:54442] helo=mail-bw0-f216.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/21-18254-49F599B4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:24:36 -0500 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so511348bwz.23 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.140.27 with SMTP id g27mr325675bku.116.1268342673195; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ilappy.local ([70.25.114.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm299424bwz.10.2010.03.11.13.24.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:24:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B995F83.1000605@prohost.org> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:24:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091223 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: <4B9926E8.4080202@lerdorf.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 From: ilia@ilia.ws (Ilia Alshanetsky) +1. I think we need we need to make "HEAD" a common use branch where most of the developers trees are at and current HEAD iteration is just not it. On 10-03-11 12:22 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Ah, Jani went a little crazy today in his typical style to force a > decision. The real decision is not whether to have a version 5.4 or > not, it is all about solving the Unicode problem. The current effort > has obviously stalled. We need to figure out how to get development > back on track in a way that people can get on board. We knew the > Unicode effort was hugely ambitious the way we approached it. There are > other ways. > > So I think Lukas and others are right, let's move the PHP 6 trunk to a > branch since we are still going to need a bunch of code from it and move > development to trunk and start exploring lighter and more approachable > ways to attack Unicode. We have a few already. Enhanced mbstring and > ext/intl. Let's see some good ideas around that and work on those in > trunk. Other features necessarily need to play along with these in the > same branch. I refuse to go down the path of a 5.4 branch and a > separate Unicode branch again. > > The main focus here needs to be to get everyone working in the same branch. > > -Rasmus > >