Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47125
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=SDcVrUXdtSjvaG19IVv8v/50RHAXvQA56G8EoeWNM3vpBwhVHbCfkfakTKxq7dvSD6
         z0zqLqXupaFyY/AB4Y/Zft5X3bWEFm3A2QFCojR3oss9g3MFM+HSkGVsi2G9ZJfP80EC
         qD/oEsDXIZ2XXm36+WRwDmF499Muo6aEWfZic=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B990AB1.3040001@iki.fi>
References: <fe05d1541003110621t328573d1p81002d59dac8eb8f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4CDEE88A-CFA2-4AA0-8E6B-0180B1E17074@pooteeweet.org>
	 <4B990AB1.3040001@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:15:50 +0100
Message-ID: <fe05d1541003111015w23058eb0rd0f47575c8cd7dfd@mail.gmail.com>
To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi
Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: svn: /php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3/ 
	README.NEW-OUTPUT-API Zend/zend_highlight.c Zend/zend_indent.c 
	ext/iconv/iconv.c ext/session/session.c ext/soap/soap.c ext/standard/basic_functions.c 
	ext/standard/exec.c ext/standard/head.c ext/st
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jani Taskinen <jani.taskinen@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 04:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>
>> @jani: committing to a stable branch because you are getting a new laptop
>> is not really a convincing argument. :)
>
> Losing the one with the changes in it is. Doing patches will only cause
> endless headaches. Please move on, nothing to see here, it's all for GOOD
> anyway, fixing bugs USED to be okay in any branch. Besides, this is not
> end-of-world. If it is for someone, I suggest changing profession.
>
> I'd like to have branch for PHP_5_4, I'll also volunteer for RM on it.
> Perhaps it makes people wanting to get movement in HEAD to actually do
> something about it.

Again, the discussion about 5.4 is premature.

I see that you created the branch already, which gives the impression
that you don't want to act in team but do whatever you want whenever
you want. Or am I missing an important discussion regarding this serie
of bad moves?

Now please revert these two commits and remove the 5.4 branch as we
have no agreement or discussion at this point. Please respect the
usual process to take decisions, even if they have to be improved,
drastically even. If you like to work on this API with 5.3, create a
specific branch, that's open and will give you the freedom you need to
modify it at wish.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org