Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47117
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vJuXvWp1OtVeMvD9jdq1CoksVQWZubSZS6ToaI2bpt7EdTCyi9uzPL+mltY668AW5v
         rziIptxUlShxbCE/oFeOJonmmBs6UlGu9QKZLo4/6XohL0/QCw+g92ispKCc7F9IIqGu
         ykASmJ+iqUqvBBUxo6sM/z5KGidIlhkxej44E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ekneuss@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <A75EB8CA-B4BC-4763-93DD-909113ED98C2@macvicar.net>
References: <fe05d1541003110621t328573d1p81002d59dac8eb8f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4CDEE88A-CFA2-4AA0-8E6B-0180B1E17074@pooteeweet.org>
	 <4B990AB1.3040001@iki.fi>
	 <A75EB8CA-B4BC-4763-93DD-909113ED98C2@macvicar.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <e666c3891003110826g51e6b747teaf424bb61ad7fd2@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net>
Cc: jani.taskinen@iki.fi, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: svn: /php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3/ 
	README.NEW-OUTPUT-API Zend/zend_highlight.c Zend/zend_indent.c 
	ext/iconv/iconv.c ext/session/session.c ext/soap/soap.c ext/standard/basic_functions.c 
	ext/standard/exec.c ext/standard/head.c ext/st
From: colder@php.net (Etienne Kneuss)

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net> wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
>> On 03/11/2010 04:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>> @jani: committing to a stable branch because you are getting a new lapt=
op is not really a convincing argument. :)
>>
>> Losing the one with the changes in it is. Doing patches will only cause =
endless headaches. Please move on, nothing to see here, it's all for GOOD a=
nyway, fixing bugs USED to be okay in any branch. Besides, this is not end-=
of-world. If it is for someone, I suggest changing profession.
>>
>> I'd like to have branch for PHP_5_4, I'll also volunteer for RM on it. P=
erhaps it makes people wanting to get movement in HEAD to actually do somet=
hing about it.
>
> +1
>
> I'm all for 5.4, I have a bunch of patches against PHP_5_3 that I want to=
 commit such a large integer support, I couldn't develop against HEAD since=
 it's just not usable.
>
> I think we can officially call PHP6 stalled and should move forward with =
5.4 and revisit unicode support in the future.

+1

>
> Scott
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch