Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46911 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45047 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2010 06:30:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2010 06:30:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sv_forums@fmethod.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sv_forums@fmethod.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fmethod.com from 69.16.228.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sv_forums@fmethod.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.16.228.148 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [69.16.228.148] ([69.16.228.148:56971] helo=host.fmethod.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0C/23-12356-C73256B4 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:30:20 -0500 Received: from [83.228.56.37] (port=4243 helo=pc) by host.fmethod.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbTK3-0008Kh-A7; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:30:15 -0600 Message-ID: To: "Rasmus Lerdorf" , "Karsten Dambekalns" Cc: References: <4B4DABED.4060202@easyflirt.com> <4B4DBF40.5040801@easyflirt.com> <4B4DCFDA.6090206@dmi.me.uk> <20100113153113.GN3978@phcomp.co.uk> <4B4DEB41.2070800@lerdorf.com> <4B6069A1.3070905@lerdorf.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:30:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.fmethod.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.php.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fmethod.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About optimization From: sv_forums@fmethod.com ("Stan Vassilev") > The gc code when combined with apc is still a bit shaky in 5.3. I > haven't figured out why yet. And my motivation for figuring it out is > pretty low as code that relies on gc is slow. > > -Rasmus Motivation for relying on GC in 5.3 is pretty low because 5.3 is still a bit shaky...