Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46806
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=oBnKIJQ+JgVUADJwvCpqDpqQxI7+7+tMb4Jnf2bXd0MDjTRVjV3bwCI3yyNs0oenEw
         JwQyWswodL22eij6xj48eFnEF3p1tr9xfPMtdoy9zre1GF6nh1V3E6uPfVzf1c94/nVS
         qW4fDefw7COZjK4OHODd9xzRuUY7foIWtWWm4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B55D72C.7060402@zend.com>
References: <4B54FC87.8070106@zend.com>
	 <fe05d1541001190253u49633f32y649aafc5f0a8ea05@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B55D72C.7060402@zend.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:02:37 +0100
Message-ID: <fe05d1541001190802y20f3fd6djd52f49c3605ea963@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] function call chaining
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I'm not a fan of this kind of syntaxic sugars, especially for
>> procedural implementation only. What are the benefits?
>
> Some as all other syntax sugars - better-looking code.

Ah ok, then let say -1 from here for the function()() thing, as I
don't see it as an improvement.

However I would really like the other things described in this thread
about methods.


Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org