Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46787 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14684 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 21:46:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 21:46:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php-php-dev@m.gmane.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=news@ger.gmane.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.12 lo.gmane.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [80.91.229.12] ([80.91.229.12:38310] helo=lo.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 94/77-22457-4A6D45B4 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:46:13 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NWzQF-0000Xv-Pg for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:46:07 +0100 Received: from 200.92.150.117 ([200.92.150.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:46:07 +0100 Received: from geissert by 200.92.150.117 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:46:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Followup-To: gmane.comp.php.devel Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:45:51 -0600 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <1263654424.3127.43.camel@guybrush> <4B522D34.7030605@sci.fi> <4B5420FA.6020301@iki.fi> <4B54D0B6.9040909@lerdorf.com> <4B54D0E3.30203@lerdorf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.92.150.117 Sender: news Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Debian PHP patches From: geissert@debian.org (Raphael Geissert) Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> >> You can read this thread about my attempts to create a portable autoconf >> setup that works both in autoconf-2.60+ and previous versions. There >> were various ideas, but in the end none of them proved to be reliable. >> >> We need diversions prior to 2.60 or whichever version introduced >> AC_PRESERVE_HELP_ORDER. In autoconf versions that have >> AC_PRESERVE_HELP_ORDER we can use that and we can drop the diversions >> entirely. >> >> Renumbering the diversions and the various other attempts people have >> made doesn't work. > > Oops, missed the thread link: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2009-11/msg00100.html > I see, thanks for the pointer. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net