Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46663 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41927 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 01:57:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 01:57:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.217.224 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.224 mail-gx0-f224.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.224] ([209.85.217.224:38912] helo=mail-gx0-f224.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 64/BD-06421-A882D4B4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:57:31 -0500 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so585740gxk.1 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:57:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.18.3 with SMTP id v3mr11646814ani.141.1263347848088; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:57:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.200.22? (c-98-234-184-167.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.184.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm11239472yxe.3.2010.01.12.17.57.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:57:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B4D2883.5040703@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:57:23 -0800 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raphael Geissert CC: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Throwing an E_DEPRECATED for short_open_tag From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Raphael Geissert wrote: > However, we would like to contribute in the quest to make applications stop > using short_open_tag. To do so, we have decided to throw an E_DEPRECATED > warning when an application makes use of short_open_tag. The current > implementation can be found at [1]. > > How does this sound? We have no plans to deprecate the short open tag. So throwing an E_DEPRECATED would not be appropriate. -Rasmus