Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46491 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40533 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 15:16:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 15:16:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jess@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jess@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jess@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:46931] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/F7-28791-DB2E03B4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:16:14 -0500 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2227050453; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:01:26 +0200 (IST) Received: from [10.1.2.102] ([10.1.2.102]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:16:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4B30E2B4.70506@zend.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:16:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Pfl=E4sterer?= CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <4B30C71B.2050207@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2009 15:16:09.0948 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0F0E9C0:01CA8319] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php-5.2.12 and pecl install: Seg. fault From: jess@zend.com (Jess Portnoy) Hello, See here: http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=3Dsuse This is very useful when trying to determining what distro has what of=20 what version. May the source be with you, Best regards, Jess Portnoy Karl Pfl=E4sterer wrote: > Jess Portnoy writes: > > =20 >> Hello, >> >> One thing that immediately comes to mind is the old OpenSSL version >> [0.9.7]. Doesn't SLES9 offer OpenSSL 0.9.8 of any version? Is 0.9.7 as >> high as it gets in their official repos? >> If so, I'd compile the latest OpenSSL on my own [0.9.8l] and try, >> also, what is the OpenSSL version on the SLES10SP2? >> >> The attached trace is not really useful as there are no debug symbols, >> if you want to go that road they will be necessary. >> =20 > > Unfortunately if I see it right 0.9.7 is the newest version for > openssl in SLES9. SLES10 has 0.9.8 and there everything works. I'll try > it with compiling openssl but I would avoid it if I could. The > maintenance for these systems (4 machines) won't be easier then :-( > > download, compile, test > > It works with openssl 0.9.8l, thanks. > > KP > > > =20