Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46488 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33366 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 14:41:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 14:41:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php-php-dev@m.gmane.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=news@ger.gmane.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.12 lo.gmane.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [80.91.229.12] ([80.91.229.12:54053] helo=lo.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/D6-28791-98AD03B4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:41:14 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NN5v8-0000g5-9h for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:41:06 +0100 Received: from 213.83.3.2 ([213.83.3.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:41:06 +0100 Received: from k by 213.83.3.2 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:41:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:40:43 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <4B30C71B.2050207@zend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.83.3.2 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uCXa0zk6JvDHODmIDyWH8aepZEs= Sender: news Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php-5.2.12 and pecl install: Seg. fault From: k@rl.pflaesterer.de ((Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pfl=E4sterer?=)) Jess Portnoy writes: > Hello, > > One thing that immediately comes to mind is the old OpenSSL version > [0.9.7]. Doesn't SLES9 offer OpenSSL 0.9.8 of any version? Is 0.9.7 as > high as it gets in their official repos? > If so, I'd compile the latest OpenSSL on my own [0.9.8l] and try, > also, what is the OpenSSL version on the SLES10SP2? > > The attached trace is not really useful as there are no debug symbols, > if you want to go that road they will be necessary. Unfortunately if I see it right 0.9.7 is the newest version for openssl in SLES9. SLES10 has 0.9.8 and there everything works. I'll try it with compiling openssl but I would avoid it if I could. The maintenance for these systems (4 machines) won't be easier then :-( download, compile, test It works with openssl 0.9.8l, thanks. KP