Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46467
Return-Path: <crocodile2u@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 59005 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2009 04:56:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Dec 2009 04:56:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=crocodile2u@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=crocodile2u@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.227 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: crocodile2u@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.227 mail-fx0-f227.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.227] ([209.85.220.227:45566] helo=mail-fx0-f227.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 78/C1-44737-A8B0B2B4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:56:44 -0500
Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so2618741fxm.23
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:56:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=CVz9Iq14ycZYetUS9XZS5Zux6G0q5QsHTpfkFvQ0/nM=;
        b=n96SOzreLKGAdrYH2t4fAb27MQHPUY1g32/m7GUCLYoPAJ2gEpjAwk1p8A++tAgZ57
         0F+sopZpkYStUzSWhS9pix4ah9iPiecuOGg/oIfYWWRNmDyJ0Xy4zihSYEkblsfFLIlz
         BKV0gHJQY9bfwWpCdUxE6RAhsXp/woYAjXK90=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=UqH1mynuZk0zUVARRBN6PH7AFlsPe499P8m4DF3XjhyHQIF4xi3V2FRntcZcDC26t3
         ulXUUpKSgJrfUF1+HuMHJQ/rQx5zad7/rQ5qxugkENWTLgL4r/v8qX8tpRCgGlZeAegX
         F0XdLN6pnL/38fbqq+tMzE+9e4cveFddDMykI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.207.3 with SMTP id e3mr1571527mug.126.1261112199972; Thu, 
	17 Dec 2009 20:56:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20091217004136.GB19675@joeysmith.com>
References: <4B01A4C2.8030602@gmx.net> <4B27DD0B.1070303@gmx.net>
	 <6571303B-82D2-43E4-8550-E2B9420BA241@pooteeweet.org>
	 <4B27E7A4.6030503@gmx.net> <20091217004136.GB19675@joeysmith.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:56:39 +0300
Message-ID: <d1d50abe0912172056m1435f2efg8b2be4e67270c53@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Closures and $this: Please vote!
From: crocodile2u@gmail.com (Victor Bolshov)

I vote for (A). bind() and bindTo() seem messy to me. However, I
mostly vote for no implicit $this changes in closures (no
javascript-like behaviour), so (A+) approach would be much better than
(C) or (D). (0) case is not my choice, because I really would like to
see $this support in closures back.

Regards,
Victor