Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46433 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4110 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 20:59:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 20:59:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chris_se@gmx.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chris_se@gmx.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.net designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chris_se@gmx.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.165.64.20 mail.gmx.net Received: from [213.165.64.20] ([213.165.64.20:45056] helo=mail.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 80/04-16228-6B8F72B4 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:59:36 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2009 20:59:27 -0000 Received: from p54A16E30.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO chris-se.dyndns.org) [84.161.110.48] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 21:59:27 +0100 X-Authenticated: #186999 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19aYk5Cmn9aEsKTAt0z0J0mg8FwLCKVchgMmhrF+5 N48HjVp9q2kAAv Received: from [192.168.0.175] (HSI-KBW-091-089-022-117.hsi2.kabelbw.de [91.89.22.117]) by chris-se.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE336A7C; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:58:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B27F841.1000806@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:57:37 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <4B01A4C2.8030602@gmx.net> <4B27DD0B.1070303@gmx.net> <6571303B-82D2-43E4-8550-E2B9420BA241@pooteeweet.org> <4B27E7A4.6030503@gmx.net> <4B27F667.9060403@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <4B27F667.9060403@zend.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Closures and $this: Please vote! From: chris_se@gmx.net (Christian Seiler) Hi, >> Ok, so then I call for a vote. Again, here are the options: > > A+, no direct method calling (get/call problem would be messy) I don't quite follow: Why A+ if no direct method calling? What would be the point of allowing bindTo() if $obj->closureProp() doesn't work anyway? If you don't want $obj->closureProp() I'd expect you to vote for A and not A+... (If you want to stick to that it's fine, I'm just a little stupefied.) Regards, Christian