Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46367 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61635 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2009 16:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Dec 2009 16:16:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.44 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.44 mail-pw0-f44.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.44] ([209.85.160.44:40808] helo=mail-pw0-f44.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5A/21-55877-C6DCF1B4 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:16:44 -0500 Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so2492084pwi.23 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:16:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h+q0JAFP3BLeCXsSqN2gsmPWzCUzDcJeEib83wis2js=; b=JCY7H5qMHlYg32GTzERPQzvWtQJTy++S+Qx2LB9TnsvPvskz4xsbk0vs1zd20AXbb6 H+S6ZI/rgl1GITxtoyEu7fBMpqcvt2Dd7DTVNgk9Frb386ersqPixvIfIdlYVN9axXLx fs+LHKINXLaXRYZBRKIZDfGwKY3kNugX1Aue8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a2yc0Dtb4roeNW6Wuz7ZabuTZYrl1Fy+MTpCbKpY/ugSn4ONwVcHfzgkgl+R/KvODF CLNKFd4xZ/BIHZqWW6/dCiULYT8jiP3HU92ZB9iw3cRYm9XPEd++NHvJNle6T5Q6iKnT et3PjBctJdAJC7CErVHa31SanbkFVT4wBXUFc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.118.4 with SMTP id q4mr1291493wfc.337.1260375396753; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:16:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3bea96c40912090711o3927e257gab87783a6763f172@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bea96c40912090655i263115bbid923deb2bdf296a6@mail.gmail.com> <4B1FBAF0.7020506@daylessday.org> <3bea96c40912090711o3927e257gab87783a6763f172@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:16:36 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?Suly9G1lIExveWV0?= Cc: Antony Dovgal , php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-FPM] syntax of configuration file From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, 2009/12/9 J=E9r=F4me Loyet : >>> We already discussed pros/cons of the two solutions. But why don't we >>> allow several syntaxes ? And let the end user to choose the better one >>> for its need ? >> >> No. Thank you. >> EOD >> > > and why of that ? Why is it already EOD wihtout arguing ? php-fpm just > started in PHP core and there is willing from people to help and make > php-fpm better, which I tought was the final goal. It is, however I have to agree with Tony here, adding a fpm specific syntax makes little sense. Or do you have any killing arguments for this new syntax (like not possible to do it otherwise, stoping point etc.)? Cheers, --=20 Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org