Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46366 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60375 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2009 16:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Dec 2009 16:15:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.133 mailout1.netbeat.de Linux 2.6 Received: from [83.243.58.133] ([83.243.58.133:46744] helo=mailout1.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6F/D0-55877-01DCF1B4 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:15:15 -0500 Received: (qmail 811 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2009 16:21:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@93.104.127.1) by mailout1.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 9 Dec 2009 16:21:37 -0000 X-Originator: 9e51b244e0a38413ab6a9876e36ba9df To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Loyet Cc: php-dev In-Reply-To: <3bea96c40912090655i263115bbid923deb2bdf296a6@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bea96c40912090655i263115bbid923deb2bdf296a6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: php.net Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:14:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1260375264.21950.6.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-FPM] syntax of configuration file From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) Hi, I know little aobut FPM but: On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:55 +0100, Jérôme Loyet wrote: > We already discussed pros/cons of the two solutions. But why don't we > allow several syntaxes ? And let the end user to choose the better one > for its need ? No. Several syntaxes makes testing harder, is more confusing to users (read two tutorials and they use completely different syntaxes, ...) and should be avoided. That just sounds like pain. johannes