Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46365 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43046 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2009 15:11:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Dec 2009 15:11:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jerome@loyet.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jerome@loyet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain loyet.net from 209.85.223.195 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jerome@loyet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.195 mail-iw0-f195.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.195] ([209.85.223.195:64318] helo=mail-iw0-f195.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/F5-12387-31EBF1B4 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:11:16 -0500 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so4825999iwn.29 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:11:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.167.65 with SMTP id p1mr1593923iby.20.1260371471542; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:11:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B1FBAF0.7020506@daylessday.org> References: <3bea96c40912090655i263115bbid923deb2bdf296a6@mail.gmail.com> <4B1FBAF0.7020506@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <3bea96c40912090711o3927e257gab87783a6763f172@mail.gmail.com> To: Antony Dovgal Cc: php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-FPM] syntax of configuration file From: jerome@loyet.net (=?ISO-8859-1?B?Suly9G1lIExveWV0?=) Le 9 d=E9cembre 2009 15:57, Antony Dovgal a =E9crit : > On 09.12.2009 17:55, J=E9r=F4me Loyet wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I start a new thread about the syntax that should be used in php-fpm >> to replace xml. >> >> As discussed before, there is different point on view on this subject: >> - INI to stay in the PHP philosophy / practicals >> - nginx because it was the will of the original authors >> >> We already discussed pros/cons of the two solutions. But why don't we >> allow several syntaxes ? And let the end user to choose the better one >> for its need ? > > No. Thank you. > EOD > and why of that ? Why is it already EOD wihtout arguing ? php-fpm just started in PHP core and there is willing from people to help and make php-fpm better, which I tought was the final goal.