Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46357 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25943 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 21:10:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 21:10:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike503@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike503@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.222.176 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike503@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.176 mail-pz0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.176] ([209.85.222.176:34871] helo=mail-pz0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AD/27-21824-CA0CE1B4 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:10:06 -0500 Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so4961956pzk.29 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:10:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RutPdkW4okMWZCAF6aFYVcYu4TdiOqjzyfVs7BeNPwM=; b=fiXYBSsQkrBCKEAv3ch5A5x1qGGH5R+UzC7uM1yvDdi0UBBx+I+6v8EWSMbkGEnc67 +vXNlYtvYPCMP81LxmSgIEn30NFCK1SBn2qKkebiDNOG0MBD6dY3EtFQhFtgY5iN3cxT zzVz5lQwmN9HQ/PKdMcEH8GsVCBV6i5bYt9Dk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gbXEF8NbGwWgo583xaZh3xqnTDMjRKqIQdqBucgB6UZ2ttW7rQed9Re9kT39VEDQG7 1JXCaN1ScyvkamzroQAdslG+t1RYJzua+dEAEuXfs1GQ3YYcVgdPEOTSFwXvsTCcJLkx /3uv86pl0/3IaWfwP7xDc73hwwzHYN6AzckiE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.101.1 with SMTP id d1mr16466744wam.40.1260306601661; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:10:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B1EA1A9.3000601@zend.com> References: <4B190660.2050107@daylessday.org> <4B1CCA1F.90802@daylessday.org> <4B1EA1A9.3000601@zend.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:10:01 -0800 Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: Pierre Joye , Antony Dovgal , php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM is available in a separate SVN branch From: mike503@gmail.com (Michael Shadle) On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > How real would be the case of 2 hosts in the same pool having same configs, > but the same hosts in different pool having different configs? I never though about that but I can tell you I use all my websites under the same pool. I partition my pools by uid/gid. So each client has their own pool. Many hosts. Typically same path prefix, but that's not a safe bet. Pool is somewhat agnostic to the host/path. > or even better strip worker. prefix - it looks like everything in worker > section is for worker, so just have something like: > > [worker:blah] > ini.error_reporting=E_ALL well to match the existing syntax you'd want [WORKER=blah] - let's not introduce too many syntaxes and such. I already think that the [HOST=] and [PATH=] can conflict (never did ask what happens if both get matched, foo.com and /htdocs/foo.com, but they have different parameters. Is it the last one in order in the config file?)