Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46356 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10811 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 18:57:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 18:57:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:59883] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 66/F4-21824-1B1AE1B4 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:57:56 -0500 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (unknown [192.168.16.5]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687D1504B2; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:43:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from [192.168.27.8] ([192.168.27.8]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:57:47 -0800 Message-ID: <4B1EA1A9.3000601@zend.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:57:45 -0800 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Shadle CC: Pierre Joye , Antony Dovgal , php-dev References: <4B190660.2050107@daylessday.org> <4B1CCA1F.90802@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2009 18:57:47.0329 (UTC) FILETIME=[5503BB10:01CA7838] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM is available in a separate SVN branch From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > Unless there is a "Pool" identifier added: > > Host can be different for the same pool > Path can be different for the same pool > .user.ini's don't work for *every* ini option. How real would be the case of 2 hosts in the same pool having same configs, but the same hosts in different pool having different configs? In general, it's not a problem having another configuration mechanism like: worker.ini.error_reporting = E_ALL or even better strip worker. prefix - it looks like everything in worker section is for worker, so just have something like: [worker:blah] ini.error_reporting=E_ALL -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com