Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46316 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39666 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2009 14:35:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2009 14:35:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.133 mailout1.netbeat.de Linux 2.6 Received: from [83.243.58.133] ([83.243.58.133:52989] helo=mailout1.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CF/99-31234-3A21D1B4 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:35:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 30894 invoked by uid 89); 7 Dec 2009 14:41:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@93.104.60.169) by mailout1.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 7 Dec 2009 14:41:31 -0000 X-Originator: 9e51b244e0a38413ab6a9876e36ba9df To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Pierre Joye , internals In-Reply-To: <4478B8CF-9446-472E-BC40-C0B18EBFA1B8@prohost.org> References: <1260193069.1383.33.camel@guybrush> <306DF528-C204-4B9E-8285-27D9FFDE11E5@prohost.org> <4478B8CF-9446-472E-BC40-C0B18EBFA1B8@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: php.net Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:34:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1260196473.1383.36.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Towards 5.3.2 From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:21 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > > It was not, and we did not forget it because of the automatic TODOs in > > the wiki (it shows all commits in a list with their states, > > http://wiki.php.net/todo/php531/log) :-). > > BS, I reminded Johannes about that patch right before the final RC, because it was still not merged. Which only the value in the sample php.ini files was, the fix itself was. And no I don't claim it was perfect and I opened this discussion for the purpose to decide on this. I *think* if we all want the release branch is the better process to create a stable release with less risk. But I can live with either approaches. johannes