Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46300 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19323 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2009 13:38:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2009 13:38:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.133 mailout1.netbeat.de Linux 2.6 Received: from [83.243.58.133] ([83.243.58.133:49691] helo=mailout1.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/F4-31234-5550D1B4 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:38:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 22787 invoked by uid 89); 7 Dec 2009 13:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@93.104.60.169) by mailout1.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 7 Dec 2009 13:44:45 -0000 X-Originator: 9e51b244e0a38413ab6a9876e36ba9df To: internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: php.net Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:37:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1260193069.1383.33.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Towards 5.3.2 From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) Hi, so, 5.3.1 out just a few weeks but due to the merge-based process and some delays in there the changelog for 5.3 is already quite long and so I'd like to restart the release process there soon. My current plan has one RC this week, one more before Christmas, maybe Tue 22nd, then a Christmas break, a RC early/mid January and release late January. I don't think we could be faster but having some RC before Christmas might get some people to test it on their new PCs they get, people who won't test otherwise, while on the other side I don't expect too much actual work being done during that time. Given the discussions and ongoing refactoring work I would keep the FPM SAPI out of 5.3.2 but aim for integration with 5.3.3. (Tony / Michael) As a process: In general I think the release branch approach is a good one while we had some trouble as there doesn't seem to be any software to really manage release branches, but the wiki evolved to a good enough merge tracker[1] imo. (The second problem with this approach was some personal distraction I had) Any comments? johannes [1] http://wiki.php.net/todo/php531/log