Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:46279 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31749 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 13:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 13:59:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 83.243.58.134 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.134 mailout2.netbeat.de Linux 2.6 Received: from [83.243.58.134] ([83.243.58.134:53556] helo=mailout2.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/C2-18655-BA5191B4 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:59:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 17862 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2009 14:04:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@93.104.45.156) by mailout2.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 4 Dec 2009 14:04:09 -0000 X-Originator: 9e51b244e0a38413ab6a9876e36ba9df To: Antony Dovgal Cc: php-dev In-Reply-To: <4B190660.2050107@daylessday.org> References: <4B190660.2050107@daylessday.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:58:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1259935098.2639.98.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM is available in a separate SVN branch From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:53 +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote: > Hello all. > > I'm glad to announce that we now have FPM SAPI available for testing in a separate SVN branch. > > You can check out its sources using the following command: > svn co http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3_FPM php_5_3_fpm How big would be the impact in regards to BC and stuff for merging it back in 5_3? If i read the svn log correct it's just a SAPI ... so adding it might be low risk as it only affects people using it. Is it related to the CGI SAPI codewise? If yes: would there be plans to merge it in some way or would we have to fix bugs in CGI, FPM and probably CLI which all have the same roots? johannes