Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45882 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32432 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2009 14:32:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Oct 2009 14:32:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=troelskn@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=troelskn@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.213 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: troelskn@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.213 mail-bw0-f213.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.213] ([209.85.218.213:52639] helo=mail-bw0-f213.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 04/D6-29961-3E2B5EA4 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:32:03 -0500 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2225064bwz.23 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uKp4Lkc4UGj27WqJYMA1Sb7Iwt9u838Y+BuW4+O4hcU=; b=RawLyTyQ2N0l4kRrCFnoe4CkF7BgDCh7jt1TRjJQt8BPuNOT+G+eGvmo6hzVKog5WL cRVgAOwSIXO75bc4VECAwvk67pKUeGgKXkg60Skgs2FzsCzWtxpl2ZPOooULqgjFeQqe ZeGDiAxJGnD6V7zaxTyQZWvzNSLwCNb8m4zAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PqG+8OiJoJjLQBZ63EmyVdRbvF8Y8sx/SzI3opfhlrwuIbxl7nTDA4gNqan/K4Qe9m 5EFRQ3+1V6QfRnNJhhmoo+mpDjbzgle2cJZZzxag2/LCxycO3jBX8FLmtYY1CYQIF6xI FgAzd0RpVM9Vi14p7PDl5ky3A33o77rB+l5+I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.5.75 with SMTP id 11mr6027597bku.20.1256567519317; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AE5B151.2050800@easyflirt.com> References: <4ADC57F3.9010401@easyflirt.com> <140eba4e0910240609k61af639fp8a4ccaf4048b9b5c@mail.gmail.com> <4AE5B151.2050800@easyflirt.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:31:56 +0100 Message-ID: <98b8086f0910260731q4e57cd7cgabb10c29785393b3@mail.gmail.com> To: Mathieu Suen Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance question about create_function From: troelskn@gmail.com (troels knak-nielsen) On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Suen wrote: > Yes that the same but only for PHP <= 5.3. > I am more asking about performance. You mean PHP < 5.3 ? In that case, I would strongly suggest that you use a procedural style. create_function is slow, leaks memory and offers no compile-time validation of syntax. It's also ugly as heck. -- troels