Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45629 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98067 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2009 17:51:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2009 17:51:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.206 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.206 mail-bw0-f206.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.206] ([209.85.218.206:60836] helo=mail-bw0-f206.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 19/29-48603-2AE09BA4 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:51:31 -0400 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2804993bwz.23 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cq3w/8Ti6rszY4Qvrevoa1TAYsqN7p88uJQSrbL6QU8=; b=ooD826FyNGA8mQpQvVL+ALae4v266lkhekv5DDgf95qlQozMg9YAZ/ZBc1Qo9I3Kxo zWWbYTy8lxgtg36ZsUJ07+nsAXEA/khPgt0Pl5RJWkbTgJWO/F0L/cfMi+wqIFRByczH SDfGueDl6G62IALVNDJpZEe/Fk9pVbIUvdMz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=G0fz7CFbeCiSaUdCzkYsUNvzZz87hW3HDETuAsm3tf6MOFSc45hiznhtzNLQBYoqhc b7mcq1VSUZup735qWpAPxdPahYpaEZGg8JbyeFrHmxmaAdoLPjTm/yd4YakQXgcDqjRZ v2Osb1I5i837aCgfQF7ofuchLvzYtIfvyqUDY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.15.136 with SMTP id k8mr606949bka.123.1253641887369; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:51:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5e33430b0909221046w3e917e56p96a9780c349568b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1252015518.1733.104.camel@guybrush> <5e33430b0909221046w3e917e56p96a9780c349568b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:51:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: X Ryl Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3.1 process From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, No, this is actually a new feature and it actually more work than what has been proposed in the various patches. We have trunk for the development of new features. On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM, X Ryl wrote: > Hi, I would like to know if PHP 5.3.1 will fix the remanent big file (> 4= GB) > issue on 32bits system. > > There was 2 patch posted to fix this, the first one was in bug #48886 and > another one is there: > http://www.php.net/~wez/lfs.diff > > I don't know what is the expected protocol to get a patch examined, but I > hope you dev will at least try them. > I personnally have tried the one from bug #48886 and it's working as > described (it's using php's double to return/handle filesize when it can'= t > be stored in an 32bits int. > As the integral part of a double is 52bits wide, this give way larger spa= ce > for the filesize). > I haven't tried the new one from wez, but the previous one didn't work. > > Hope it will get considered. > Regards, > X > > > > > > 2009/9/19 Pierre Joye > >> hi Johannes, >> >> It is a really great improvement that we don't have to worry anymore >> about being in a release phase for a given branch. However one thing I >> would like to improve in the merge frequency. Having a large merge the >> day (or the day before) a RC does not sound too god to me. It would be >> much safer to merge more often so we can valid them before the release >> or point you to some missing bits if necessary. >> >> Thoughts&comments welcome, >> >> Cheers, >> >> 2009/9/4 Johannes Schl=FCter : >> > Hi, >> > >> > a new tool provides new opportunities and challenges, with the move to >> > svn I took some of the new possibilities and after many discussions >> > created a new release process which I'll try for 5.3.1 for which RC1 i= s >> > about to be packed. (having trouble accessing the snaps box to build >> > it...) >> > >> > The very short story for most devs is to go on and work on the branche= s >> > as before (meaning trunk, PHP_5_3, PHP_5_2, commit at once etc.) >> > >> > The longer story is this: >> > >> > I've created a new branch PHP_5_3_1. This release branch receives >> > selective merges by the RM (me) only! >> > >> > This branch will then be used to create RCs as often as needed >> > containing these fixes, as we won't have snaps for this branch only sv= n >> > checkouts and RCs will be available for testing. Therefore the aim is = to >> > provide stable RCs and the only change between the last RC and the >> > stable release shall be the version number change. >> > >> > Once 5.3.1 is to be published the PHP_5_3_1 branch will be converted >> > into a php_5_3_1 tag. (svn mv) And the 5.3.1 NEWS will be merged back >> > into PHP_5_3. >> > >> > When committing to PHP_5_3 please be conservative till 5.3.1 is out to >> > ease merging and testing (we have no snaps for PHP_5_3_1) and try to >> > indicate whether you think the change should be merged or not and tell >> > me if you think I missed to merge a commit. >> > >> > Once 5.3.1 is released this process will be reviewed and either be >> > documented or modified. >> > >> > Hoping this works out, >> > johannes >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Pierre >> >> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > --=20 Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org