Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45627 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95168 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2009 17:46:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2009 17:46:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=boite.pour.spam@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=boite.pour.spam@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: boite.pour.spam@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.216 mail-ew0-f216.google.com Received: from [209.85.219.216] ([209.85.219.216:52583] helo=mail-ew0-f216.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/78-48603-E7D09BA4 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:46:39 -0400 Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so3959978ewy.24 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=t6BxO90TwKSt2cjiNVmfqbmsNwExOEejpD758ZqRISA=; b=xIgaU9VquflmAJCGTCMV7oRISlWZLwJjObaCzFnfVsomL2KA0n1jGlXkn//OL9jgPn T3wMBRSQxpwU0lbWd9vknavr/NYb44mQyyLvu7i+ojJadgJ81++qrV4vXiTPckXjBwfR erzOerzObRQ+x6mh+RdV6CG5m3TXn/BCI6oag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=bW2eb/P7U82qdqMHz8o/Smu0AigSwAhsrFAe0tW9dj13Y88jADKfyZAPfFCwuhfDsG EEKRMSSQbG79I8+ySfflCdcnfBOrr4zxRfMz4csyCjoyz5OT3ikiblRiU89egGG1GSkG slsev9SdfJHjlIejXkp2rREv7Oti1fUMJeu78= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.143.13 with SMTP id v13mr1362319ebn.21.1253641596128; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1252015518.1733.104.camel@guybrush> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:46:36 +0200 Message-ID: <5e33430b0909221046w3e917e56p96a9780c349568b4@mail.gmail.com> Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d35f034f8204742e2e80 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3.1 process From: boite.pour.spam@gmail.com (X Ryl) --00504502d35f034f8204742e2e80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I would like to know if PHP 5.3.1 will fix the remanent big file (> 4GB= ) issue on 32bits system. There was 2 patch posted to fix this, the first one was in bug #48886 and another one is there: http://www.php.net/~wez/lfs.diff I don't know what is the expected protocol to get a patch examined, but I hope you dev will at least try them. I personnally have tried the one from bug #48886 and it's working as described (it's using php's double to return/handle filesize when it can't be stored in an 32bits int. As the integral part of a double is 52bits wide, this give way larger space for the filesize). I haven't tried the new one from wez, but the previous one didn't work. Hope it will get considered. Regards, X 2009/9/19 Pierre Joye > hi Johannes, > > It is a really great improvement that we don't have to worry anymore > about being in a release phase for a given branch. However one thing I > would like to improve in the merge frequency. Having a large merge the > day (or the day before) a RC does not sound too god to me. It would be > much safer to merge more often so we can valid them before the release > or point you to some missing bits if necessary. > > Thoughts&comments welcome, > > Cheers, > > 2009/9/4 Johannes Schl=FCter : > > Hi, > > > > a new tool provides new opportunities and challenges, with the move to > > svn I took some of the new possibilities and after many discussions > > created a new release process which I'll try for 5.3.1 for which RC1 is > > about to be packed. (having trouble accessing the snaps box to build > > it...) > > > > The very short story for most devs is to go on and work on the branches > > as before (meaning trunk, PHP_5_3, PHP_5_2, commit at once etc.) > > > > The longer story is this: > > > > I've created a new branch PHP_5_3_1. This release branch receives > > selective merges by the RM (me) only! > > > > This branch will then be used to create RCs as often as needed > > containing these fixes, as we won't have snaps for this branch only svn > > checkouts and RCs will be available for testing. Therefore the aim is t= o > > provide stable RCs and the only change between the last RC and the > > stable release shall be the version number change. > > > > Once 5.3.1 is to be published the PHP_5_3_1 branch will be converted > > into a php_5_3_1 tag. (svn mv) And the 5.3.1 NEWS will be merged back > > into PHP_5_3. > > > > When committing to PHP_5_3 please be conservative till 5.3.1 is out to > > ease merging and testing (we have no snaps for PHP_5_3_1) and try to > > indicate whether you think the change should be merged or not and tell > > me if you think I missed to merge a commit. > > > > Once 5.3.1 is released this process will be reviewed and either be > > documented or modified. > > > > Hoping this works out, > > johannes > > > > > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > -- > Pierre > > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --00504502d35f034f8204742e2e80--