Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45525 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86271 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 01:14:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 01:14:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dreamcat4@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dreamcat4@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.212 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dreamcat4@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.212 mail-fx0-f212.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.212] ([209.85.220.212:65235] helo=mail-fx0-f212.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F7/A9-26597-C7107AA4 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:14:37 -0400 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so3003606fxm.23 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=haLwVBfWzKuIGqbbSbhEc/wOOV/tApa51ocn2V37+YU=; b=QymBSxG2q5nOQeBdgYafBvoPJK+Ix/69YotjLXEobUevvXSomXkJYuGnu+Q+gcZY+7 FFKJTKPhRHnFufH0l8pV+EcEHAtA2kTeMd/HhorZXY0LvitxBrMh2o+KUR3AJwsXG/6b Hh6lcJyQuaE9NtFXKV2rmb3iYjSxAfcACovL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KxTEe+GJgn9jHTFOWoOUbJsyHuvy6KoQqnOW1eqgtc97W2+yfc7v9HHYfM1rbJUdrt YKbxB9oXb5J1f2G65hZoFFe/vquaBUNn/9kTrDOe5721aAEME6tSku5TenEpn660r6Cu Bcqdf9S5+2tZ59nsjdCbWLRpbNqfbvDyrUYkA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.92.153 with SMTP id r25mr6268710fam.99.1252458873307; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:14:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AA6F06C.4020008@lerdorf.com> References: <99cf22520909081652v29a9ea56q33882849cce3081e@mail.gmail.com> <4AA6F06C.4020008@lerdorf.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:14:11 +0100 Message-ID: <99cf22520909081814w64ef896rbf1bffda9354e72c@mail.gmail.com> To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: internals@lists.php.net, jvlad , Dmitri Dmitrienko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [sapi] PHP-FPM (FastCGI Process Manager), by Andrei Nigmatulin - upstream Y/n? From: dreamcat4@gmail.com (dreamcat four) I'm 99% sure, this proposal this time around is for a seperate SAPI only. So that's not the question being asked here. The question is: Do you want fpm-sapi (or not)? On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > This has been discussed before. =C2=A0See: > http://news.php.net/php.internals/44476 > http://news.php.net/php.internals/44480 > http://news.php.net/php.internals/44484 > http://news.php.net/php.internals/44485 > > Basically it comes down to figuring out whether to extend the existing > FastCGI SAPI to support the process management in FPM, or add it as a > separate SAPI. > > -Rasmus