Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45283 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29139 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2009 17:54:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2009 17:54:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=scholz@scriptolutions.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=scholz@scriptolutions.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain scriptolutions.com from 85.13.138.236 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: scholz@scriptolutions.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.13.138.236 dd17920.kasserver.com Received: from [85.13.138.236] ([85.13.138.236:49701] helo=dd17920.kasserver.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 04/D2-15479-DC7488A4 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:54:22 -0400 Received: from MYWORKSTATION (unknown [114.128.178.130]) by dd17920.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83DB182EF993; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:53:51 +0700 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.08) Professional Reply-To: Lothar Scholz Organization: Scriptolutions X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <613920271.20090817005351@scriptolutions.com> To: Paul Biggar CC: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <465610226.20090816150239@scriptolutions.com> <1035866081.20090816155804@scriptolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[5]: [PHP-DEV] Design of the Zend Engine's Instruction Set From: scholz@scriptolutions.com (Lothar Scholz) Hello Paul, PB> Yes, by many times. Part of that might be the expense of PHP's weak PB> typing and references. No. Smalltalk, Javascript, Lua they all have the same problem with it and they solve it in much more clever and performant ways. Javascript with its class free OO is even harder and with V8 they have a much much better solution. It's just the implementation - not the language. PB> They cause most operations to be more PB> expensive, even if they are not used in that particular operation. PB> I did a performance analysis of PHP in a paper I have in submission. PB> You might find it interesting (comment welcome): PB> https://www.cs.tcd.ie/~pbiggar/wip-sac-journal.pdf. Thanks, just had a 10min quick look at it - hope to find some more time later. And first of all begin a tool writer (IDE Developer) myself i can't agree more about the problems with "the source is the specification" idea. This sucks so huge and is such a fucking lazy argument of an incompetent language development team. By the way greetings to Matz and his team who also sucks with his CRuby. I really questioning the skills of a lot of core programmers when i read the PHP manual section about namespaces. Simple questions about scopes of identifier aliasing - nothing of this is specified. A buggy implementation should solve as reference? Damn'd fucking college boys. This was an acceptable development method for PHP3. Okay i must cool myself down. I've seen that you talked about branch prediction misses in your paper. Did you ever tried to compile the original PHP with different compilers, for example from intel or sun studio? Did you test or have you ever heard of someone who tested the influence of the profiling feedback that modern C compilers offer? (Well don't ask me - it's somewhere on my TODO list - but i also haven't had the time yet). -- Best regards, Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com