Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45137
Return-Path: <lewiswright@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98490 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 09:25:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 09:25:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lewiswright@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lewiswright@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.220 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lewiswright@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.220 mail-fx0-f220.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.220] ([209.85.220.220:59444] helo=mail-fx0-f220.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 3B/73-16652-217617A4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:25:39 -0400
Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so536634fxm.24
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=IqTj7ioznP08Ek/H64E52GgHm85LGZ78DSW77gUo3ew=;
        b=WL/1czWKuwxKA0lDmZ3LWfByR6qciCoz4c1MAkrsSpxaAeXfLOX8xf0mXaKqpmSGcZ
         lB52rFQdTwSAjNbMBJFbtFcSFxHIsB8zdNyqyOvSxlOuAdL+BkP1v8umI3YE0NblrpJB
         gt6PjC5xlQLJu7HdPQCRO+3KlqdN8gEYqFnds=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=lyaN9JnAwvMNLiWn9Lau7Csu7VvR2TKfvpYbPfEM9EFWhHUciZpjMHfF7K/ekcZ9lH
         aC4wDWrYd7o3M/r6zxr/PiO/uLaRns+ruSZHjAwBjYxcZBOr4ZP0sVGvrv+9b2aAOb8r
         WsxvTeMnOkS/fYVrgOlvqQaBonRDX/tgsAV2Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.108.1 with SMTP id k1mr540749mum.40.1248945935141; Thu, 30 
	Jul 2009 02:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b5f7bf6c0907300218ncbeaa48o99ae783638f31541@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bcb7aa500907292008m67021b98s54938233a5783ddc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<b5f7bf6c0907300218ncbeaa48o99ae783638f31541@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:25:15 +0100
Message-ID: <f3eeaf7e0907300225m4e3e2795qe6d5200db2f691e1@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Coallier <davidc@php.net>
Cc: Guilherme Blanco <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Travis Swicegood <travis@domain51.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364267d9cecd7c046fe8e2f0
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting ArrayObject in array_* functions
From: lewiswright@gmail.com (Lewis Wright)

--0016364267d9cecd7c046fe8e2f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/7/30 David Coallier <davidc@php.net>

> >
> > What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> > instances in array_* functions?
> > If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
> > patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
> > function.
> >
>
> I think it's a marvelous idea :)
>
> I'm attaching Travis Swicegood to this as he had cooked a very simple
> but effective patch for that at #tek09
>

I would also find it very useful.

--0016364267d9cecd7c046fe8e2f0--