Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45111 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72506 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 03:27:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 03:27:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.222.173 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.173 mail-pz0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.173] ([209.85.222.173:45265] helo=mail-pz0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/2A-01210-3107E6A4 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:27:16 -0400 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so426989pzk.29 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.174.16 with SMTP id w16mr11383393wae.17.1248751633005; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?216.145.54.15? (socks3.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.54.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n30sm15060202wag.6.2009.07.27.20.27.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6E700E.7040304@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:27:10 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List CC: mozo@mozo.jp X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ext/iconv/tests/bug16069.phpt From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Moriyoshi, or someone who knows CP932 and EUC-JP, could you please have a look at ext/iconv/tests/bug16069.phpt It is failing in all the branches, so I am assuming the expected output listed in the test is wrong, but I am a bit lost in figuring out how to tell what is going wrong at byte 113 into the output there. -Rasmus