Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45079
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.210 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mGMhsW3fEK5I2bNHh21JtRoUlso075r1lpp1wjNqhsoLvk99FXr+X7pKqN0Hye9lHh
         A7Zfm42xmwX2j0JRM5P5Wlpj7tqhNt7S4WAR8tPUbvHISdnluOr7nK/DFy3ubxlw3WJH
         5uifaijB7zhyHSPGkURzYHzRDTTY+P+cDd6LM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cd5680a20907240735h31019559j8038349449a68c0b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD.98.39659.DC5B96A4@pb1.pair.com>
	 <2dedb8a0907240640i118d220fte7ed4e0285aae024@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CA.5A.39659.79AB96A4@pb1.pair.com>
	 <7f3ed2c30907240729i16a07871q2eb165c36f27752c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cd5680a20907240735h31019559j8038349449a68c0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:38:23 +0200
Message-ID: <7f3ed2c30907240738r31e2a502gd388c9a7653f80f8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ben Scholzen 'DASPRiD'" <mail@dasprids.de>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Replacing errors with Exceptions
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 16:35, Alexey Zakhlestin<indeyets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Hannes
> Magnusson<hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 15:43, Ben Scholzen 'DASPRiD'<mail@dasprids.de> wrote:
>>> To you both, this is especially, for library code like Zend Framework.
>>> The library cannot expect the user to have the error handle set, so it
>>> would have to replace the error handler before every line which it wants
>>> to try {} and reset it after the catch. This is not really a clean
>>> solution, at it can occur pretty often.
>>
>> Why do you have to replace it?
>
> because in case of a library, there is a "third-party" called "user".
> User might have his own opinion on error-handlers. And then, there's
> even worse case, when there are 2 or three libraries mixed in the
> single project

No. The RFC says it should throw Exception. There is no need for other
error handlers in that case.

If you want multiple error handlers then create RFC for error handler stacking.


-Hannes