Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:45014 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50803 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 09:22:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 09:22:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=webmaster@keryx.se; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=webmaster@keryx.se; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain keryx.se designates 208.69.121.33 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: webmaster@keryx.se X-Host-Fingerprint: 208.69.121.33 supavet.nexcess.net Received: from [208.69.121.33] ([208.69.121.33:54600] helo=supavet.nexcess.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/A3-29850-0C2406A4 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:22:10 -0400 Received: (qmail 14985 invoked by uid 108); 17 Jul 2009 05:22:05 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.198?) (gunther@keryx.se@87.227.57.139) by supavet.nexcess.net with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 05:22:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6042B6.8020102@keryx.se> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:21:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1pre) Gecko/20090715 Lightning/1.0pre Shredder/3.0b3pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4A5CF17B.1040102@keryx.se> <7d6e34d80907141506m5ff583b4vb4e8da7cd969120f@mail.gmail.com> <4A5DA008.6010603@keryx.se> In-Reply-To: <4A5DA008.6010603@keryx.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype functions in PHP 6 From: webmaster@keryx.se (Keryx Web) Please forgive me bumping this, bit I think my questions are valid and I can't find authoritative and relevant info on php.net or Google. If indeed I have broken protocol, as feared in my ending, could anyone please tell me so (off list in order to reduce the noise, of course) and kindly point me to a better place to ask these questions? On 2009-07-15 11:23, Keryx Web wrote: > On 2009-07-15 00:06, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > >> I believe the latest discussion settled on rewriting ctype_* functions >> to use ICU internally in HEAD, so that they work correctly on Unicode >> strings. >> >> -Andrei > > That simplifies things. I actually believe that the word about this has > to spread, since I am not the only one with the impression that these > functions are going.[1][2][3] > > I can not find any open bugs on this, but did find the meeting notes > that confirms Andrei's message.[4] > > As for mixed messages. Is not the fact that they are listed on this > page: http://www.php.net/~scoates/unicode/render_func_data.php an > indication that the work already has been done? > > Also: Am I correct in assuming that the new ICU-based ctype functions > will use locale_set_default() instead of setlocale()? > > (A side note: Will the preg-functions continue to use setlocale()?) > > And finally, I hope my asking these questions are not out of place. I > chose this list since I need authoritative answers and my questions are > about internals issues. I beg your forgiveness if I have contributed to > any unnecessary noise. > >1. http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/php-dev/3529073 > 2. http://devzone.zend.com/article/2448 > 3. http://wiki.php.net/todo/php60 Item 1:7 > > 4. http://wiki.php.net/summits/pdmnotesmay09 -- Keryx Web (Lars Gunther) http://keryx.se/ http://twitter.com/itpastorn/ http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/