Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44823 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69526 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 09:17:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 09:17:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:49800] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/2B-10517-424645A4 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:17:25 -0400 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27225050C; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:18:24 +0300 (IDT) Received: from lap-zeev.zend.com ([10.1.11.100]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:18:02 +0300 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20090708121425.0d55efe0@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:16:49 +0300 To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP internals In-Reply-To: <4A539638.3060704@lerdorf.com> References: <2D0F5226-EBCA-4B45-BF01-8ED1C643976C@prohost.org> <4A539638.3060704@lerdorf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2009 09:18:02.0891 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEABF5B0:01C9FFAC] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Type hinting/casting request for vote From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 21:38 07/07/2009, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >-1 on 5.3. The window for adding new major features to 5.3 is obviously >long gone. Not sure why you are even suggesting it. > >+0 on parts of it for the next major release. You still haven't >convinced me that strict type checking won't cause more problems than it >will solve, but I do see the benefits. Agreed 100%: -1 on 5.3. Such a major change simply does not belong in 5.3 as a last-minute addition. +0 for revisiting for the next major release. Will change to +1 if we focus on conversion only - with slightly stricter semantics than the ones for internal functions, but with very much the same theme - as per my email. Zeev