Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44802 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77899 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 23:14:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 23:14:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.222.198 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.198 mail-pz0-f198.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.198] ([209.85.222.198:55222] helo=mail-pz0-f198.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/48-37453-DE6D35A4 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:14:54 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so5172754pzk.29 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr10229929waf.67.1247008490810; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?216.145.54.15? (socks3.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.54.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j15sm3331382waf.51.2009.07.07.16.14.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A53D6E8.7080705@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:14:48 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Biggar CC: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= , Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP internals References: <2D0F5226-EBCA-4B45-BF01-8ED1C643976C@prohost.org> <1247006344.3760.164.camel@goldfinger.johannes.nop> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Type hinting/casting request for vote From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Paul Biggar wrote: > - the RFC process has been wilfully ignored (despite multiple requests) For me it is pretty hard to take a major feature for 5.3 RFC seriously when it comes a week after we finally get 5.3 out the door. -Rasmus