Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44797 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52362 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 21:17:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 21:17:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=gwynne@darkrainfall.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=gwynne@darkrainfall.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain darkrainfall.org from 208.97.132.145 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: gwynne@darkrainfall.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 208.97.132.145 caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com Received: from [208.97.132.145] ([208.97.132.145:45455] helo=homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2E/B1-37453-756B35A4 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400 Received: from Moonstar.home (pool-71-174-84-161.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.84.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDD6C5ACA; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP internals Message-ID: <91C15ED6-099C-42BE-92B2-B65702C8A0F9@darkrainfall.org> To: Andrei Zmievski In-Reply-To: <4A53832E.6030105@gravitonic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:55:46 -0400 References: <2D0F5226-EBCA-4B45-BF01-8ED1C643976C@prohost.org> <4A53825F.1080006@gravitonic.com> <4A53832E.6030105@gravitonic.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Type hinting/casting request for vote From: gwynne@darkrainfall.org (Gwynne Raskind) On Jul 7, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote: >>> I would like to ask all developers to voice their opinions of >>> whether it makes sense to add this to 5.3 or to throw it away >>> (either one is fine btw). To keep the process simple & flamewar >>> free, please restrict yourself to +/- (1/0), next week monday I'll >>> run a tally of the votes and based on the result we can determine >>> how to proceed further. >> +1. > Sorry, I should have read better. My +1 was for the feature in > general, not for 5.3. I think we should concentrate most of the new > feature development on 6.0, now that 5.3 is out to avoid having yet > another "feature-filled" 5.x release. > > So, once again, completely against this going into 5.3. Same here. +1 for HEAD, -1 for 5.3. -- Gwynne