Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44778 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13439 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:17:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:17:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andrei@gravitonic.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andrei@gravitonic.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain gravitonic.com from 209.85.222.198 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andrei@gravitonic.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.198 mail-pz0-f198.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.198] ([209.85.222.198:54672] helo=mail-pz0-f198.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B6/F3-17523-233835A4 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:17:40 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so5034873pzk.29 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.215.19 with SMTP id n19mr2074452wfg.20.1246987056133; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from barley.local (64-71-7-198.static.wiline.com [64.71.7.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm8321293wfc.16.2009.07.07.10.17.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A53832E.6030105@gravitonic.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:17:34 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: PHP internals References: <2D0F5226-EBCA-4B45-BF01-8ED1C643976C@prohost.org> <4A53825F.1080006@gravitonic.com> In-Reply-To: <4A53825F.1080006@gravitonic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Type hinting/casting request for vote From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski) Andrei Zmievski wrote: >> I would like to ask all developers to voice their opinions of whether >> it makes sense to add this to 5.3 or to throw it away (either one is >> fine btw). To keep the process simple & flamewar free, please restrict >> yourself to +/- (1/0), next week monday I'll run a tally of the votes >> and based on the result we can determine how to proceed further. > > +1. Sorry, I should have read better. My +1 was for the feature in general, not for 5.3. I think we should concentrate most of the new feature development on 6.0, now that 5.3 is out to avoid having yet another "feature-filled" 5.x release. So, once again, completely against this going into 5.3. -Andrei