Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44697 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45728 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 14:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 14:05:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=paul.biggar@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=paul.biggar@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: paul.biggar@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.220.155 fg-out-1718.google.com Received: from [72.14.220.155] ([72.14.220.155:7150] helo=fg-out-1718.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B5/46-06257-EA16F4A4 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:05:35 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so889480fga.0 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l93ePSvwvDc2wxJT2l2nQZ+QlsYMToqu/x5wWO9LjeE=; b=R04nx6l3BmOWesOxLNcJzkbHOO9YVOswYIl3Rj0fO4pQUuR1uvnYRAqYgwLS1mJKJu OXGY5yGvvvs3GMs8R9HKlZIPxkEDy+7iQoMWgAZ2VgaipvyUNPjvuWnQkyQ3z8yJFNwF 4+6o6npBv1AQWnM0Dadp0nDIZ+8XNPcIYfXck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f0HxgaI/qT0PGzAPfH+mq25hCWed+w8xtbCy10HJsRNacOgPNqX0kkEb78mTJPc8zC 84JxsJqClh8k5K3jTOsZe9BQ9olEzG8D4poOvWng6hMYaWwCUnJuvyZAfIqGnEoxOQVi O2DE/fnqBn2fD1wpDNEIx+1mG14YrLtp3yFJY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.94.13 with SMTP id r13mr1383717fgb.19.1246716331120; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5A834C9A-6D1B-49B7-88E6-FF047B084AB6@pooteeweet.org> References: <5A834C9A-6D1B-49B7-88E6-FF047B084AB6@pooteeweet.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:05:11 +0100 Message-ID: To: Lukas Kahwe Smith Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] weak and strict type checking RFC From: paul.biggar@gmail.com (Paul Biggar) Hi Lukas, On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Last evening I put together a quick proposal for a weak and strict checking > approach, since I felt that things were being concluded a bit prematurely. > More importantly I detailed the issues I see with a pure strict type > checking only approach. I can't see the difference between your proposal and the conclusion I reached yesterday? (which was that there is a near consensus around strict checks by default, with casts allowed with some syntax). Thanks, Paul -- Paul Biggar paul.biggar@gmail.com