Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44455 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68988 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2009 15:47:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jun 2009 15:47:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=giovanni@giacobbi.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=giovanni@giacobbi.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain giacobbi.net from 95.110.130.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: giovanni@giacobbi.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 95.110.130.42 gerbil.thgnet.it Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [95.110.130.42] ([95.110.130.42:49347] helo=gerbil.thgnet.it) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F5/E1-20236-98A424A4 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:47:22 -0400 Received: from johnny by gerbil.thgnet.it with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MJUgq-0006JN-Bb; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:47:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:47:12 +0200 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <20090624154712.GD19880@gerbil.thgnet.it> References: <364F0E20-96D9-4B96-84C1-68AFCADA8671@pooteeweet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <364F0E20-96D9-4B96-84C1-68AFCADA8671@pooteeweet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3.0 stable delayed until next Tuesday From: giovanni@giacobbi.net (Giovanni Giacobbi) On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Aloha, > > As most of you following this list have noticed, alot of last minute > stuff has been brought up. So it goes. > Johannes and Pierre have put in extra time in trying to still make it > for a release tomorrow, however as the stream of patches and open > issues has continued even today, we have decided to play it safe and > move the release date to next Tuesday. We will package tomorrow > evening and push out the release to mirrors next Monday. > Do you think it's worth to push out an RC5 and release it as 5.3.0 only changing the version number between them? I saw other projects doing this and I think it helps to prevent major issues due to last-time fixes. I have this feeling that 5.3.0 release is going to be traumatic! Just my 2 cents. -- Giovanni Giacobbi